Let`s take a look at the regulatory advances of recent years that are helping MSBs and state licenses abroad. State licenses increase the operation of a crypto operation that doubles as an effective barrier to access for companies that are not well funded or prepared. To act as a money broadcaster in a state, a cryptocurrency transaction such as a virtual currency change must meet the same licensing and regulatory requirements as traditional financial institutions. Other states are expected to join Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Texas and Washington if the compact accelerates. This compact is the first step towards an optimized MSB licensing process. Experts hope this is the beginning of a 50-country licensing program. Financial service providers, currency issuers, payment service providers, currency changers and fintech companies will benefit greatly from this integrated approach. Unfortunately, and unsurprisingly for any company that is aware of licensing in the United States, there is no single money chain license that can operate in the United States. Currently, only Montana (and South Carolina until 2018) do not need a license for money issuers. The granting of a money chain license in New York is probably the most difficult at present, as shown by the NYDFS application rejected by the famous Bittrex Stock Exchange. However, recent New York licensing reforms are encouraging. A first step towards a simpler multi-state licensing process? While registering as an MSB money issuer at FinCEN is a quick and painless online procedure, getting your money issuer license (MTL) in your business is an expensive process. The second pilot program began in early October 2018 with 15 participating companies.

To date, seven Phase 1 certifications were issued and seven licences were approved. This pilot experiment is underway. However, the complexity of U.S. legislation, combined with the confusing regulatory oversight of the federal government, has made the country a frightening target for almost all virtual money transactions, which face very different licensing requirements and costs that only the largest and best-funded companies can afford. The United States is also seen as arrears to effectively regulate new innovations in virtual assets such as DeFi, stablecoins and the central bank`s digital currencies. In this article, we will take a closer look at the licensing requirements that these statutory financial issuers must meet on a government basis. Under a new multi-state licensing agreement, one state will accept the findings of another state during the process of applying for monetary issuer licences. When a company applies for its money issuer licence, the state ensures that it has a business plan, its own background control and that it complies with the requirements of bank secrecy (BSA) and anti-money laundering (AML). The State Coalition agreed that if one state reconsiders the common key elements of a money issuer`s licence application, the other states will agree to accept that state`s findings. The common key elements of the licensing applications that will receive this reciprocity are those of the applicant: Greg Gonzales, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, says: “With this initiative, state governments will be able to respond to business innovations while ensuring compliance with legislation.